Glenn Greenwald has an insightful-as-usual post up about the California gay marriage ruling. He basically points out that the CA Supreme Court's recent ruling basically requiring CA's civil unions to be now made equal marriages is fully in accordance with CA law and the state constitution. His points are:
- As the court found, this ruling must be based on California law and the California Constitution, not whether or not you think gay marriage in CA should or should not be legal
- This ruling is not in violation of the "will of the people." He points out that the CA legislature has, not once, but twice approved a gay marriage bill vetoed by the governor, who said that the issue must be settled by the CA Supreme Court.
- The ruling doesn't legalize gay marriage. It just says that separate-but-equal civil unions are unconstitutional.
- Lastly, he predicts all sort of ignorant and hystical political overreaction to this ruling from the right-wingnuts.
So, let's look for the hysteria.
World Nut Daily quoting some hate-filled preacher:
Now activist judges are overruling the will of the people...
Of course, to get to the really good stuff, you have to head over to Free Republic:
Queerly beloved in the land of fruit, nuts and cereal.
Sodom, Gomorrah and Kalifornia too!
I’d say the odds of the Next “ Big One “ just shot off the charts..
We need a Federal Marriage Amendment to the Constitution to end this judicial tyranny.
I’m going to marry my gun and take it everywhere I go.
And that's not the bad stuff. These people really have a fascination with bestiality and incest:
And now you can marry the Sheep of your choice, because to prohibit such would of course be a violation of your right to Equal Protection of the Laws.
There is no argument for gay marriage that does not equally support marriage between two people who are already related by blood.
If the legislature now strikes “between a man and a woman” and does not replace it with something like “between one human and another” things will get interesting.
remember their argum,ent is they love each other ... well you can love a sheep
so by that logic marriage could be anything people marrying animals, as what as happened elsewhere in the world namely India [WTF?] we can have more than one wife or husband Kids as young 5 could get married
That's from the first 100 postings on Free Republic. There are over five hundred more. Republicans disgust me. I'm going to go shower now.